Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 23, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Townsend, J., Spartanburg. Indictment against Tom Adams and Pink Macombson for house breaking and larceny. Both convicted, and Adams, being sentenced, appealed. cites: One defendant may introduce testimony to contradict his codefendant: 23 S. E. R., 476; 29 S. C., 230. was represented by Assistant Attorney General Townsend in oral argument.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice McIver.

The defendant was indicted jointly with one Pink Macombson for house-breaking and larceny, and they were defended by different counsel. The testimony on the part of the State was “that (the) storehouse of A. G. Floyd was broken and entered on the night of the 7th or morning of the 8th of November, 1895, and that a cheese, several boxes of cartridges and three pistols were stolen; one of the pistols was a hammerless pistol and the other two were what the witnesses called ‘breakdown pistols’ — meaning a pistol that would unhinge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . GoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  2. Blassingame v. City of LaurensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  3. State v. RussSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  4. Miller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Miller, Administrator v. A.C.L.R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API