Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller, Administrator v. A.C.L.R. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 10, 1926No. 12063Published

1Dissent

I dissent from the opinion of Mr. Justice Watts in this case, affirming the judgment below, and think that it should be reversed, for the reasons which follow.

My objections to the validity of the judgment are hereinafter set forth in italics under separate subdivisions. Before entering upon a discussion of these several objections, it appears proper to make the following:

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

This is an action for $50,000 damages on account of the alleged wrongful death of the intestate, D.B. Miller, who was killed as the result of a collision between a north-bound train of the Atlantic Coast…

2Cases cited93 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Chisolm v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. Sandel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API