Legal Opinion

Berthoff v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 9, 2001No. CIV.A.97-10883-WGYPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

140 F.Supp.2d 50 (2001)

Frederic W. BERTHOFF, Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

No. CIV.A.97-10883-WGY.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

April 9, 2001.

Michael C. Bourbeau, Boston, MA, for Frederic W. Berthoff, Petitioner.

Andrew Levchuk, United States Attorney's Office, Springfield, MA, Thomas C. Frongillo, United States Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for United States of America, Respondent.

REPORT

YOUNG, Chief Judge.

[The] executive take[s] idealistic, energetic, ambitious young men and[, in elected politics,] turn[s] them into whores in five years; the judiciary…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. In Re Avery W. Vial, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Michael Donald Dodd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  3. United States v. KandirakisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  4. Frederic W. Berthoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API