Legal Opinion

Carmichael v. Riley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 1988No. 87-119PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richard Carmichael filed an action against the Alabama State Board of Medical Examiners ("the Board"), claiming that the Board's actions had denied his right to due process of law. The complaint was later amended to add or substitute other defendants. Carmichael alleges that he was denied a physician's assistant's license because the Board held a meeting without giving him notice and decided at that meeting not to grant him a license. The trial court held that Carmichael had no statutory right to be present at the meeting on October 16, 1984, and therefore, that there was no denial of due…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Fulton v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Boles v. BlackstockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Houston v. McClureSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Green v. Bradley Const., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parker v. HilliardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Boat Shack II, Inc. v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Vise v. Cole Sanitation, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. H.R. v. State Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Jowers v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API