Legal Opinion

Boat Shack II, Inc. v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 1991No. 89-1571, 1900594PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMON, Justice.

The Boat Shack II, Inc. (“the Boat Shack”), Roger Bevan, and Cynthia Bevan appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, ITT Commercial Finance Corporation (“ITT”), on ITT’s claim for recovery of collateral. The appellants also appeal from the dismissal of their counterclaim. When it instituted this action, ITT used Rule 64(b), Ala.R.Civ.P., to obtain a writ of seizure of the property. Without using the procedure available under Rule 64(b) to have the writ of seizure set aside and without making a showing that they were not in default or that ITT was not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foster v. Greer and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Boles v. BlackstockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Ex Parte AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Parker v. HilliardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Ex Parte Alabama Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Environmental Mgmt. v. LeafCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  2. Scunziano v. ScunzianoCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Department of Environmental Mgmt. v. LeafCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API