Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Standard Harrow Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to recover royalties.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

The plaintiff, the owner of certain letters patent for improvements in potato diggers, and the inventor of certain other improvements not then patented, entered into a written contract with the defendant, granting to the latter the sole and exclusive right and license to make and sell the machines containing said inventions and improvements ; in consideration whereof the defendant agreed to pay a royalty of five dollars on each of the first 5,000 machines manufactured and sold, a royalty of four dollars on each of the second 5,000 machines manufactured and sold, and thereafter a royalty of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex. Rel. West Side Street Railway Co. v. BarnardNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Wing v. . Ansonia Clock Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Hamilton v. Park & McKay Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Ebert v. LoewensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Corbet v. Manhattan Brass Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. O. B. McClintock Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Fairchild v. City & County Contract Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API