Brown v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Concurrence
BARNES, J.,
specially concurring:
¶ 16. I fully concur with the majority that Brown’s motion for post-conviction relief (PCR) is time-barred. However, I cannot leave unchallenged Judge Roberts’s conclusion in his separate opinion that the amendment to Mississippi Code Annotated section 99-39-5 eliminated the requirement that a person be in custody under the Mississippi sentence that he is challenging, and thus, Brown had standing to bring a motion for post-conviction relief. While the amendment alters the definition of custody to some extent, it does not delete the requirement of custody.
¶ 17.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lackawanna County District Attorney v. CossSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Daniels v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Claypool v. MladineoMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Mississippi Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. GandyMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.