Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Atkins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 30, 1957No. 36535PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

1. While it is true that Code § 70-305 requires that immaterial portions of the transcript of evidence be stricken therefrom, this rule is for the benefit of the court and not the parties litigant. Hargett v. Muscogee Bank, 32 Ga. App. 701 (1) (124 S. E. 541). The brief of evidence in the present case while containing immaterial portions of the transcript of evidence was only five pages in length and this court does not feel that it has been inconvenienced by the failure to remove these immaterial portions of the transcript. Therefore, this court will rule on all assignments of error properly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hargett v. Muscogee BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Miller v. SpeightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  4. Vaughn v. BurtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heard v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API