Legal Opinion

Shostack v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 14, 1943Published

1Opinion of the CourtKeniston, C. J.

This is an action in tort in which the plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received while a traveler, upon a public way by reason of the front wheel of the wagon in which he was driving, catching in a large hole in the street beside the car tracks of the defendant, tipping the wagon and throwing. the plaintiff to the ground.

Count 1 is for negligence of the defendant in not maintaining its tracks and the street adjacent thereto in a safe condition. Count. 2 is for maintaining a nuisance.

The answer is a general denial and contributory negligence.

*179At the trial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. DiLorenzo v. Atlantic National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Doherty v. Inhabitants of AyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Conroy v. MatherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Boston Elevated Railway Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Vincent v. Norton & Taunton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API