State v. Ellard
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
David C. Ellard appeals his jury convictions for each of three counts of first degree theft by deception. RCW 9A.56.020(1)(b); RCW 9A.56.030. We affirm as to count 1. We find the evidence of value as to counts 2 and 3 insufficient to support convictions for first degree theft. We therefore vacate the judgments on these convictions and remand for imposition of new sentences for second and third degree theft.
Mr. Ellard was accused of unlawfully obtaining money from the Tacoma School District. He is the owner of Ellard Tire & Wheel, a Goodyear tire franchise which was under contract with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- State v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MercyWashington Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- State v. TinkerWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. TinkerWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.