Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Howe & Wise

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 12, 1959No. 13360PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WERLEIN, Justice.

Appellees, W. F. Smith and Jason Umber, partners under the firm name of Howe & Wise, brought this suit'against appellant, City of Houston, to recover compensation or fees for supervisory engineering services in connection with the San Jacinto River Water Supply Project, known as Lake Houston, alleging that they were entitled to be paid for their engineering services 5% of what it cost appellant to do the work, as provided in a written contract entered into by them and appellant on February 1, 1951. They alleged that they were paid $102,663.52 for work actually performed under…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Robert E. McKee, General Contractor v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Anderson & Kerr Drilling Co. v. BruhlmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Tower Contracting Company v. FloresTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. City of Tyler v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Shenandoah Associates v. J & K Properties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  2. Medical Towers, Ltd. v. St. Luke's Episcopal HospitalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Gary Crossland, Cross-Appellants v. Canteen Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Hall v. BirchfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Lede v. AycockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API