Legal Opinion

Beall v. A2Z Limousine Trans

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided June 29, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00194Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION EDWARD BEALL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) VS. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. ) A2Z LIMOUSINE TRANS and JIMMY ) 3:18-CV-0194-G CHARDY, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the court is the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants A2Z Limousine Trans (“A2Z”) and Jimmy Chauhdry1 (“Chauhdry”) (collectively “defendants”). Defendants’ Motion and Brief for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) (docket entry 97). For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND The plaintiff Edward Beall…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API