Legal Opinion
United States v. Gigante
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 19, 1999No. 93 CR 368PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The defendant seeks an order permitting him to ask the jurors who tried this case in 1997 about possible improper influences that may have affected their verdict and about possible violations of the court’s injunction not to discuss the case except during deliberations. A conviction had resulted in a long prison term. See United States v. Gigante, 989 F.Supp. 436 (E.D.N.Y.1998) (sentencing); 996 F.Supp. 194 (E.D.N.Y.1998) (defendant competent to be sentenced); 982 F.Supp. 140 (E.D.N.Y.1997) (post-verdict motions), aff'd, 166…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Sun Myung Moon and Takeru KamiyamaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Kevin Williams-DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Oscar H. KleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Vincent Gigante, Also Known as "Chin,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. ReskoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. ClarkColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Hamilton v. Accu-TekDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Larson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003
- United States v. SabhnaniDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008