Knight, Yancey & Co. v. Ætna Cotton Mills
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Purdy, J., Union, June, 1907. Action by Knight, Yancey & Co. against .¿Etna Cotton Mills. Prom order permitting plaintiffs to amend their complaint, defendant appeals. cite: 8 Ency., 1007, 1010'; 45 S. C., 368; Code 1902, 2310; 72 S. C., 37; 18 S. C., 316; 57 S, C., 266; 24 S. C., 476. cite: 72 S. C., 35; 45 S. C., 344; 64 S. C., 246; 35 S. C., 361; 73 S. C., 368; 70 S. C., 266; 68 S. C., 506; 30 S. C., 564.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
'The appeal- herein is from an order of Judge Purdy, granting plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint.
O'f the five causes of -action attempted to> be stated, the first four related to the recovery of loss or damage by reason of defendant’s failure to comply with the terms of four contracts for the future delivery of spot cotton, the first being for $731.25, with interest from November 1, 1905, on October, 1905, contract for 250 bales of cotton; the second for $437.50, with interest from December 1, 1905, on November, 1905, -contract…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ruberg v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
- Hall v. WoodwardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
- Proctor v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
- Pickett v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Jennings v. ParrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Metts v. WenbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Greenville Community Hotel Corp. v. Alexander Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Grist v. CaldwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Morgan v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
- Alamance Industries v. Chesterfield Hosiery MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.