Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 26, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). Under our statute, if any person shall falsely utter words which, in their common acceptation, shall amount to charge any person with having been guilty of fornication or adultery, such words, so spoken, shall be deemed slander, and shall be actionable as such. Crawford & Moses ’ Digest, § 2394.

In the construction of this statute it has been held that an oral charge of unchastity in a woman is actionable per se. Jackson v. Williams, 92 Ark. 486. The instructions of the court on this phase of the case were correct. It is contended, however, that the court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Logan v. LoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Robertson v. EdelsteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Jackson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Studdard v. TrucksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
  5. Craig v. PylesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. KittermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API