In the Matter of Anonymous
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Disciplinary Commission and the respondent agree that the respondent in this lawyer disciplinary proceeding violated Rule 1.15(a) 1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law by commingling personal funds with client funds in his lawyer trust account. The parties further agree that the appropriate sanction for that misconduct is a private reprimand. We agree and therefore accept the parties’ agreed resolution, but wish to recount the facts and circumstances of this case in order to demonstrate the delicate nature of trust fund accounting and the need for…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of LehmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
4Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Discipline of Trujillo, No. 4428Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Redmond v. Lentz & Clark, P.A. (In Re Wagers)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. KellingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. KellingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011