Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Anonymous

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1998No. 49S00-9606-DI-470PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The Disciplinary Commission and the respondent agree that the respondent in this lawyer disciplinary proceeding violated Rule 1.15(a) 1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law by commingling personal funds with client funds in his lawyer trust account. The parties further agree that the appropriate sanction for that misconduct is a private reprimand. We agree and therefore accept the parties’ agreed resolution, but wish to recount the facts and circumstances of this case in order to demonstrate the delicate nature of trust fund accounting and the need for…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of LehmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Discipline of Trujillo, No. 4428Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Redmond v. Lentz & Clark, P.A. (In Re Wagers)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. KellingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. KellingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API