Legal Opinion
Nsinano v. Sessions
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 21, 2017No. Case No. 5:17-cv-00094-VBF (GJS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
Dismissing the Section 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition With Prejudice for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction;
Directing Entry of Separate Judgment
VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, Senior United States District Judge
Jason Sinagwana Nsinano (“petitioner”) is a federal immigration detainee being housed in a privately operated federal prison in Adelanto, California. Proceeding pro se, petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“petition”) against the United States Attorney General1 on January 19, 2017. See Case Management / Electronic Case Filing System…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Matheson v. Progressive Specialty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Neama El Sayed Ramadan Gaser Hesham El Gendy v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- MacArio Bonilla v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pedro Perez Perez v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Ana Karin Palacios-Bernal v. William P. BarrDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Pedro Perez Perez v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Towet v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021