Legal Opinion
Royal v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 12, 2001No. 5D00-583PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
784 So.2d 1210 (2001)
Mark ROYAL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D00-583.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 12, 2001.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and John M. Selden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alfred Washington, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
GRIFFIN, J.
Appellant, Mark Royal ["Royal"], appeals a final judgment after pleading no contest to the sale of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a convenience business, and possession with intent to sell.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Watt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Instructions 25.9-25.13Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Lazier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Lazier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010