In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Instructions 25.9-25.13
Supreme Court of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCanady, J.
I concur with the majority’s decision to adopt amendments to Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases 25.9 through 24.13 — with the exception of the majority’s adoption of the instruction that states: “If you have a reasonable doubt on the question of whether defendant knew of the illicit nature of the controlled substancé, you should find defendant not guilty.” Majority op. at 1211. While Florida law is clear that the defendant must carry the burden of production regarding the affirmative defense of lack of knowledge of the illicit nature of a controlled substance, Florida law is not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.