American Seeding Machine Co. v. Holzbauer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Clay county to recover $606.68 upon a promissory note. Tbe case was tried before Nye, J"., and a jury wbicb returned a verdict in favor of defendants. From an order denying plaintiff’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding tbe verdict or for a new trial, it appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action to recover upon a promissory note made and delivered by defendants to P. P. Mast & Co., and indorsed and transferred to plaintiff, in wbicb defendants bad a verdict, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new •trial.
Tbe facts are as follows: Defendant Holzbauer and one Newman were copartners, engaged in tbe sale of farm machinery at Fergus Falls. On November 11, 1905, tbe firm ordered of P. P. Mast & Co., of Springfield, Obio, tbe shipment and delivery to them of' certain grain drills, for wbicb they agreed to pay in the. manner and at tbe…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Larson v. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Avery Planter Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Healy-Owen-Hartzell Co. v. Montevideo Farmers & Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925