Legal Opinion
Lucier v. Manchester
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 4, 1922PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.
“All the powers vested by law in towns, or in the inhabitants thereof, shall be exercised by the city councils. . . .” P. S. c. 50, s. 1.
“The common council of the city of Manchester is hereby abolished and all the powers now by law vested in said common council are hereby vested in the board of mayor and aldermen of said city, to be exercised by said board of mayor and aldermen in addition to all the existing powers of said board.” Laws 1915, c. 249, s. 1.
By virtue of these statutes, all the powers vested by law .in towns are exercised by the mayor and aldermen. Kelley v. Kennard, 60 N. H.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Amazeen v. NewcastleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
- Clough v. VerretteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
- Hall v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
- Hett v. PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
- Baker v. NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frank B. Abbadessa v. Moore Business Forms, Inc., Robert D. Mariotti v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- City of Concord v. TompkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Board of Water Commissioners v. MooneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Bigwood v. Merrimack Village DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Michael v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.