United States v. Brandt
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
ON RECONSIDERATION
CEDARBURG, Chief Judge:
Appellant, pursuant to his pleas of guilty, was convicted of attempting to sell 433 grams of hash oil, a marijuana derivative, and wrongful possession of hash oil in violation of Articles 80 and 134 UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 934, respectively. The two offenses were considered multiplicious, but the maximum confinement at hard labor, in addition to ancillary penalties, considered both in the providency inquiry and on sentencing, was 5 years, the penalty authorized for a drug offense charged under Article 134, UCMJ. In our decision in United States v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CourtneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. HardenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. AllbeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. LarneardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. FosterU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. KraffaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981