Legal Opinion
Karfiol v. Rothner
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York
Decided November 30, 1908Published
In Equity. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
CHATFIELD, District Judge.
The complainant is the patentee of a machine and a method for the making of lace paper; that is, paper containing perforations in an ornamental design, more or less resembling lace or embroidery. The particular patents in question, Nos. *924835,189, 835,190, and 835,283, were issued upon the 6th day of November 1906, upon applications filed, respectively, July 5 and July 17, 1906, and July 5, 1906.
■ The first patent relates to the method of perforating the paper, and in general describes a change from the ideas of cutting perforations or holes with the aid of some…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hillard v. Fisher Book TypewriterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
- Hillard v. Fisher Book Typewriter Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907