Legal Opinion · Dissent

STATE BY VAN RIPER v. Atlantic City Electric Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 21, 1957Published

1Dissent

Jacobs, J., joined by Vanderbilt, C. J.

(dissenting). For many years the Atlantic City Electric Company required that certain consumers (presumably transient residents) furnish security deposits in order to obtain service. Having no other choice they did so and in many instances later moved away without ever demanding the return of their deposits or so much thereof as remained after their final bills were marked paid. It would seem quite apparent that the consumers never thought of themselves as having made loans which would be barred by the running of the statutory period of limitations…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Pintsch Compressing Co. v. Buffalo Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. Brooklyn Borough Gas Co. v. Bennett, New York County Courts1935
  4. In Re Newark Shoe Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API