Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bill's Printing, Inc. v. Carder

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 29, 2004No. 03-779Published

1ConcurrenceRay Thornton, Justice

I concur in the stice, this case be reversed, but I would not base that reversal on the majority’s bona ^de-purchaser analysis.

In this case, the Land Commissioner acted pursuant to his interpretation of the applicable statutes, Ark. Code Ann. § 22-6-102(a) (Repl. 1996), Ark. Code Ann. § 26-37-204(b) (Repl. 1997), and Ark. Code Ann. § 26-37-301(b) (Repl. 1997), to set aside the limited-warranty deed that he had executed in favor of the Carders after the statutory period for redemption had passed. Even after the execution of a limited-warranty deed to the purchaser of property at a .tax sale,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. State of Washington v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Tsann Kuen Enterprises Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Bearden v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API