High Mesa General Partnership v. Patterson
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
{1} The issue before us is whether a notice of lis pendens is properly filed in connection with an appeal under Rule 1-074 NMRA (2007) (amended 2008) by a third party who does not have a personal interest in the title to the property. Under the circumstances in this case, the district court determined that the notice of lis pendens was appropriately filed. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
{2} Plaintiffs, High Mesa General Partnership, Jon MeCallister, David W. Harper, and Placitas, Inc. (High Mesa), are owners and developers of certain real property located in Sandoval County.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Durham v. GuestNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Mundy Ranch, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- HIGH MESA GEN. P'SHIP v. PattersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010