Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Redwine Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 9, 1918No. 9296PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Certiorari; from Fayette superior court—Judge Searcy. . September 19, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. A factor is one who not only receives goods and mercandise for hire, but, being entrusted with the possession, control, and disposal of the goods of Ms principal for a commission, has a lien for all advances made thereon and expenses incurred in respect thereto. In order to liquidate such demands, he may, as a general rule, and in *456accordance with the usages of trade, sell a sufficiency of the goods so entrusted (Civil Code of 1910, § 3502; Whigham v. Fountain, 132 Ga. 277, 63 S. E. 1115); but even though the factor’s agency be thus coupled with an interest, if there should be an express…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Citizens Banking Co. v. Peacock & CarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Waring v. GaskillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Whigham v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Halliday v. Bank of Stewart CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Harrell v. Citizens Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Tucker & PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Henry Cotton Mills v. Shoenig & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Malone v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Southern Exchange Bank v. LangstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Hall v. VannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API