Legal Opinion

Southern Exchange Bank v. Langston

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 12, 1925No. 15722PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “Recoupment is a right of the defendant to have a deduction from the amount of the plaintiff's damages, for the reason that the plaintiff has not -complied with the cross-obligations or independent covenants arising-under the same contract.” It-“may be pleaded in all actions ex contractu, where from any reason the plaintiff .under the same contract is in good conscience liable to defendant;” and where recoupment may be pleaded, “if the damages of the defendant shall exceed, in amount, those of the plaintiff, the defendant shall in such cases recover of the plaintiff the amount of such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Tucker & PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Palmour v. RoperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Thornton v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Norton v. GrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Campbell v. Redwine Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Highland v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Barber v. Sheridan Trust & Savings BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Evans v. OdumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Brukas v. Union National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API