Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Hackney

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1991No. 590A90Published

1Opinion of the Court

404 S.E.2d 854 (1991)

329 N.C. 166

John W. BROOKS

v.

Harold D. HACKNEY and Margaret B. Hackney.

No. 590A90.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 12, 1991.

Law Firm of Wade Barber by Wade Barber, Pittsboro, for plaintiff-appellee.

Edwards & Atwater by Phil S. Edwards, Siler City and Love & Wicker by Dennis Wicker, Sanford, for defendants-appellants.

MEYER, Justice.

This case presents the questions of whether an agreement for the sale of real estate fails for indefiniteness of the description of the property and, if so, whether it will, nevertheless, be enforced on principles of equity.

An examination of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Thompson v. SolesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Brooks v. HackneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Farmer v. . BattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API