Brooks v. Hackney
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
404 S.E.2d 854 (1991)
329 N.C. 166
John W. BROOKS
v.
Harold D. HACKNEY and Margaret B. Hackney.
No. 590A90.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
June 12, 1991.
Law Firm of Wade Barber by Wade Barber, Pittsboro, for plaintiff-appellee.
Edwards & Atwater by Phil S. Edwards, Siler City and Love & Wicker by Dennis Wicker, Sanford, for defendants-appellants.
MEYER, Justice.
This case presents the questions of whether an agreement for the sale of real estate fails for indefiniteness of the description of the property and, if so, whether it will, nevertheless, be enforced on principles of equity.
An examination of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Thompson v. SolesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Brooks v. HackneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Farmer v. . BattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.