Legal Opinion
Joyner v. Mitchell
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 19, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Barry
delivered the opinion of the court.
Defendant in error filed a bill to foreclose a real estate mortgage. The mortgage covered premises upon which there was a house and a machine shop. Plaintiffs in error filed an answer in which they averred that the mortgage did not cover certain articles in the machine shop. The articles in question are as follows: One lathe of the weight of about 2,000 pounds; another of the weight of 6,000 pounds, and another of about 400 pounds; a milling machine, 4,900 pounds; a drill press, 2,500 pounds; a planer, 6,000 pounds; an air…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Planter's Bank v. Lummus Cotton Gin Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- Fifield v. Farmers' National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Owings v. EstesIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- Calumet Iron & Steel Co. v. LathropAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
- Department of Public Works & Buildings v. EppersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ayrshire Coal Co. v. Property Tax Appeal BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Efaich Co. v. WickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Dual Temp Installations, Inc. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Kenny v. T. L. Arzt Foundry Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Property Tax Appeal BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.