Loveland v. Leslie
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
James, J. —
A hearing tribunal appointed by the Washington State Human Rights Commission entered a finding of discrimination on the basis of marital status against appellants, Hugo and Ruby Loveland. On appeal to superior court, the decision was affirmed. We affirm the trial court.
The Lovelands are owners of several apartment units in North Bend. In answer to a newspaper advertisement for a 2-bedroom apartment, Steve Leslie contacted the Love-lands by telephone. Leslie told Mrs. Loveland that he was interested in the apartment for himself and a male roommate. Mrs. Loveland's response was that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Fleming v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Blondheim v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, & Pacific Railroad v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Swift v. Island CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Foreman v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Skold v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Evergreen School District No. 114 v. Human Rights CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Washington Medical Disciplinary Board v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Yamauchi v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.