Olsen v. Crow

From the earliest times in the jurisprudence of Oregon (See Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Wall, 1 Or. 295) to the decision of the recent case of Dixon v. Simpson, 130 Or. 211 (279 P. 939), the public policy of this jurisdiction has demanded that there should be an end of litigation, “and the courts look with a jealous eye upon suits which have for their object the setting aside of a judgment at law.”

In the case at bar, the story told by the record tends to show that, for nearly three years after the rendition of the judgment against them, Leonard Olsen and Myrtle Crosland neglected to avail…