Legal Opinion
Student Doe 1 v. Lower Merion School District
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 24, 2010No. Civil Action 09-2095PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BAYLSON, District Judge.
Pending before this Court is Defendant Lower Merion School District’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 32). Plaintiffs Student Does 1 through 9, by and through their Parents/Guardians 1 through 10 (“Plaintiffs”), allege, inter alia, that they were discriminated against based on their race when Defendant adopted a redistricting plan in January 2009 that took away their ability to choose what high school to attend, and required them to attend a particular high school. For the reasons that follow, the Court will not award…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blunt v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Blunt v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- McGLOTTEN v. OMNIMAX INTERNATIONAL, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023