Legal Opinion
Chrin v. Ibrix, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 15, 2008No. 07-2931, 07-3466UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Proceeding pro se, David Chrin appeals the District Court’s order denying his motion to remand to state court and dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Because we write for the parties, we state only those facts most pertinent to our decision.
Chrin is a co-inventor of a method of electronic file sharing and storage. In 2000, he signed a “Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement” (“CIIA”) promising to assign any potential patents to Ibrix, Inc in exchange for employment with Ibrix. In 2001, he began employment with Ibrix. That same year, the…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Stanford Shane Otis Terrell Robert Stewart v. William Fauver, Commissioner James Barbo, Administrator Rogers, Chief Director of CustodyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Shamell Samuel-Bassett, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Vives v. RodriguezDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Antonio J. Blackstone v. Dauphin County Court of Common PleasDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025