Legal Opinion

City of Monticello v. Christensen

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 23, 1989No. 880343-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals his conviction of driving without a valid Utah license. The charge originated in the justice of the peace court where defendant was convicted. Upon his appeal to the circuit court he was again convicted. Defendant contends that he is a citizen of Wyoming and possesses a valid Wyoming driver’s license. His Wyoming license was introduced as a trial exhibit. 1 Therefore, he argues, he was not driving without a valid driver’s license.

Plaintiff Monticello City filed a motion to summarily dismiss this appeal, asserting that under Utah Code Ann. § 77-35-26(13)(a) (1988), this court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McCardellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. LindenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Thompson v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Monticello v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. HorrocksCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  3. City of Kanab v. GuskeyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  4. Pleasant Grove City v. OrvisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  5. State v. MatusCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API