Legal Opinion

King v. Hill

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1941No. 2377—7719Published

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Commissioner.

This is an action of trespass to try title brought by plaintiffs in error, Hannibal King, et al., against defendants in error, Charles C. Hill, et al., the land involved being 44y§ acres out of the C. C. Marsh survey in Houston county. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of defendants in error and that judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 136 S.W.2d 632, 633.

Defendants in error claim title under deed from H. G. Denby to G. W. Mobley. Plaintiffs in error claim title, in part at least, under G. H. Denby. Defendants in error introduced in evidence an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rivers v. FooteTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Mann v. FalconTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  3. McSween v. YettTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Paul v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Hannay v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1855

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API