Legal Opinion

Brown v. Sentinel Investigations Service Inc.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided May 21, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarry Gittleson, J.

The plaintiff has served a second amended complaint in support of his claim for compensation pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 as amended (U. S, Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq., as amd.) at the rate of one and a-half times his regular rate for all hours worked by him in excess of 40 hours in the capacity of a watchman while employed by defendant for a period commencing April 24, 1960, to November 12, 1962.

The complaint is challenged upon the ground that the same “ does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.”

The (complaint alleges in substance:

a. “He worked…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Mitchell v. H. B. Zachry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Condon v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Shilbury v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Sunhill Water Corp. v. Water Resources CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. Ogden v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API