Legal Opinion

Guill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 24, 1912No. 1277PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

By correct complaint and information appellant was prosecuted, tried and convicted for an aggravated assault and fined $50.

The court at which he was tried convened on February 6, and adjourned February 25, 1911.

There is no statement of facts in the record. This was a misdemeanor case prosecuted and tried in the County Court. There is with the file in this court a separate document which purports to be a statement of facts. It is not copied nor certified in the record. The court below allowed thirty days after adjournment to file a statement of facts and bills of exceptions.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gentry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Mosher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Misso v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Blackshire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hopson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API