Legal Opinion

Islam v. City of Bridgeton

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 28, 2011No. Civil 08-1844 (JBS/AMD)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMANDLE, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This civil rights matter is before the Court on two motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by the Defendants James Shrader and the City of Bridgeton [Docket Item 52], and Defendant Douglas Van Sant [Docket Item 53]. For the reasons that follow, the motions will both be denied in part and granted in part.

II. BACKGROUND

Near closing time on April 18, 2006, Plaintiff Pamela Winrow Islam entered the Motor Vehicle Commission (MVC) office in the City of Bridgeton, New Jersey, to obtain a duplicate…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Geissler v. City of Atlantic CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
  2. DICKERSON v. WALLKILL VALLEY REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  3. GOODELMAN v. LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  4. GOULD v. O'NEALDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  5. INTER METALS GROUP v. CENTRANS MARINE SHIPPINGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API