Legal Opinion

Brod v. Detroit Life Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1931No. Docket No. 155, Calendar No. 35,329PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

May 7, 1925, defendant issued to plaintiff a life insurance policy, with a supplemental agreement attached, containing the provision:

“After one full year’s premium shall have been paid and before default in the payment of any subsequent premium hereon, if the insured under the above numbered policy, prior to attaining the age of sixty years at nearest birthday and while this policy is in full force, shall furnish due proof to the company at its home office, that he has become totally and permanently disabled by bodily injury or disease, so that he is and presumably will be permanently,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Ginell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. Shipp v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Maze v. Equitable Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  3. Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Richards v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Mitchell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API