Legal Opinion

Turcotte v. Stangl

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtBegis O’Brien, J.

Motion by plaintiff for an order (1) directing that tbe answer be stricken (2) that summary judgment be granted; and (3) that plaintiff’s alleged damages be assessed by an Official Beferee.

Cross motion by defendant, under rule 113 of tbe Buies of Civil Practice, for an order dismissing tbe complaint.

Tbe plaintiff’s complaint alleges, in part, that defendant came into possession of plaintiff’s Tilt Top Trailer on or about October 7, 1957; that on or about October 21, 1957, plaintiff duly demanded its return from defendant, wbicb defendant failed to do; that plaintiff commenced an action in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Retter v. WebberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. H. T. C. Hotel Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Scharfman v. May-Claire Costume Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API