Retter v. Webber
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The action is in replevin for possession of a team of horses, and for damages for withholding the same. The judgment entered on a jury verdict is for a sum of money only consisting of the value of the horses and the damages for withholding. The form of the judgment is improper. It should have been for the *194possession of the horses together with the plaintiff’s damages for detention,, and for the value of the horses as fixed by the jury to -be paid by the defendant if possession of the horses is not delivered to the plaintiff. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1124.) Considering the way the case was left to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fitzhugh v. . WimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Hitchcock v. WimplebergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tauber v. National Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Satterwhite v. Harriman Nat. Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- H. T. C. Hotel Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Kimburg v. Mayer, New York County Courts1934
- Sonne v. BroganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.