Legal Opinion

Retter v. Webber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The action is in replevin for possession of a team of horses, and for damages for withholding the same. The judgment entered on a jury verdict is for a sum of money only consisting of the value of the horses and the damages for withholding. The form of the judgment is improper. It should have been for the *194possession of the horses together with the plaintiff’s damages for detention,, and for the value of the horses as fixed by the jury to -be paid by the defendant if possession of the horses is not delivered to the plaintiff. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1124.) Considering the way the case was left to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fitzhugh v. . WimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Hitchcock v. WimplebergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tauber v. National Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  2. Satterwhite v. Harriman Nat. Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
  3. H. T. C. Hotel Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Kimburg v. Mayer, New York County Courts1934
  5. Sonne v. BroganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API