People v. Eberle
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before sentence from Jackson; Parkinson, J. Carl Eberle and Stephen H. Carrol were convicted of violating the local-option law.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
Respondents were convicted under the local-option law, adopted and in force in Jackson county, upon a charge that they “did manufacture brewed, malt, and intoxicating liquors, to wit, beer,” contrary to the provisions of said law. The case is before this court upon exceptions before sentence.
The facts are not in dispute. No question is raised but that the local-option law, prohibiting, among other things, the manufacture of brewed, malt, and intoxicating liquors, was, at the time charged, in force in said county. It is admitted that respondents did manufacture the beer in question.
The defense…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Feek v. Township Board of BloomingdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. HawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. McMurchyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Daugherty v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Fitzpatrick v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Eastwood Park Amusement Co. v. Mayor of East DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Buffalo Gravel Corp. v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.