Legal Opinion

In re Propulsid Products Liability Litigation

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided June 4, 2002No. MDL 135PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

FALLON, District Judge.

Before the Court is plaintiff Virginia Gail Jones’s motion filed in connection with her class action seeking certification of a nationwide class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2). For reasons set forth below the motion is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Introduction

Propulsid is the trade name for a family of prescription drug products which contain the active pharmaceutical ingredient Cisapride. It was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1993 to be used in treating the symptoms of nocturnal heartburn due to gastroesophageal…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gateway KGMP Development, Inc. v. Tecumseh Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Compaq Computer Corp. v. LaprayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. v. ArmondMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In re Pharmaceutical Industry Average Wholesale Price LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  5. Michael Sutton v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc., and St. Jude Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API