Roemer v. Pappas
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
*204Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
Defendants James L. and Alice Pappas appeal from a judgment establishing a right-of-way by necessity across their property.
I. Facts and Procedural History
The property which is the subject of this suit consists of two adjoining parcels of land, the Highland Court parcel (Highland parcel) and the Roemer parcel. Dr. Thomas Clark recorded a deed to the Highland parcel on March 23, 1946. He acquired the Roemer parcel through an installment land sale contract entered by December 26, 1948, at the latest. (The contract could not be found, but its existence is not disputed.)
On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Eisley v. MohanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Estate of ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- HUONG QUE, INC. v. LuuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- City of Hollister v. Monterey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. Elementis Pigments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- In Re Providian Credit Card CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.