State v. Branch
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
At the outset, counsel for defendant state that assignments of error 1, 3, 4, 7, 18 and 20 are abandoned, conceding that they are without merit in fact and law. This is in accord with proper and candid procedure in appellate practice.
The defendant’s second assignment of error is to the refusal of the trial judge to quash the bill of indictment because it described the premises alleged to have been entered as the dwelling house of one J. C. Jones situated in Nash County. Upon the authority of State v. Knight, 261 N.C. 17, 134 S.E. 2d 101, and the authority of State v. Burgess, 1 N.C. App. 142,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- People v. SayersNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Gross v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.