State v. Terline
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Indictment charging perjury 'upon facts set out in full in opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.
This is an indictment against the defendant, charging him with having committed the crime of perjury while testifying as a witness in the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, on the 15th day of September, 1899, in the trial of a complaint and warrant wherein Eeuben E. Baker was complainant and Francesco Di Nardo was defendant.
Upon the trial of said indictment the defendant was convicted ; and he now petitions for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was against the law- and the evidence, and that the trial court erred in certain of its rulings.
The defendant is an Italian and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VoseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- People v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- People v. Ah YuteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People v. Lee FatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Miller v. LathropSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Fong LoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Garcia v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. FelicianoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- State v. FeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Saavedra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.