Danforth v. National Chemical Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action by C. E. Danforth against'the National Chemical Company and others. F. B. Hart intervened. There was judgment on the pleadings against intervenor, and from an order of the district court for Bamsey county, Otis, J., denying his motion for a new trial, intervenor appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
There is no dispute over the facts in this case. Dan-*309forth, as a judgment creditor of the defendant corporation, an alleged insolvent, instituted an action in the month of February, 1894, under the provisions of G-. S. 1894, c. 76, § 5897, making several alleged stockholders defendants with the corporation. Such proceedings were had as resulted in the entry of a judgment April 28, 1894, sequestrating the property, effects, and assets of the defendant corporation as an insolvent, and within the provisions of said chapter, and appointing one Dobner receiver of all of the property, effects, and…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Hanson v. DavisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Hale v. HardonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899
- McGhee v. Casualty Co. of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 1921
- Goldman v. ChristySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Buffum v. HaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.