Cummings v. Fearey
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. Garnishment. The garnishees bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
This controversy has already been before us, as reported in 41 Mich. 376, in which the present defendants were plaintiffs. There is very little in the present record which was not in the former one, and most of the questions now presented are of minor importance. One legal question, however, stands at the threshold of the case, on which some doubts have arisen.
By § 6504 of the Compiled Laws of 1871 it is declared *40that “every garnishee shall be allowed to deduct from the property in his hands all his demand against the principal defendant, of which he could have availed himself if he had not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fearey v. CummingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crippen v. JacobsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Blake v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. AT & G. CO., INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Noyes v. BraceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Vining v. MillarMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.