Legal Opinion

Key v. Stringer

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1949No. 16545PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) We think that the court properly overruled the demurrer for the following reasons: (1) The allegations of the petition, as we view them, are sufficient to show not only a trespass on the plaintiff’s land, but a continuing one, and this being true, the case comes within the rule that equity will, by injunction, repress a continuing trespass. Gainesville Midland R. Co. v. Tyner, 204 Ga. 535 (50 S. E. 2d, 108), et cit. (2) It is affirmatively alleged in the petition that the plaintiff owns and is in the possession of a described tract of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gainesville Midland Railroad v. TynerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  2. Richardson v. HairriedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Phinizy v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Lunsford v. ArmourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Amear v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Williams v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Smith v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  4. Duffee v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Roughton v. THIELE KAOLIN COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API